2009 Polaris IQ 600/800

Back In The Saddle

2009 marks the return of the performance trail sleds from Polaris. We’re talking the bread and butter, the meat of the line-up. Last year, Polaris only offered us a 700 IQ, which was kind of a head scratcher. Not to worry, they’ve made up for it by coming with a 600 IQ and the mighty 800 IQ for 2009.
Polaris hard cores will be sure to notice that there are also 600 & 800 Dragon SP models for 2009. This is true. The Dragon SP models are truly a notch higher, mostly in their suspension calibration and capability. But they also cost $700 more than the IQ versions. For the majority of performance trail riders, we believe the 600 & 800 IQ models are a better match, but you do get a lot for the $700 when you step up to the Dragon SPs.


That’s why Polaris smartly offers different levels of performance at different prices. The 600/800 IQ is a prime example; it gives you the latest technology, but does so with a suspension calibration that is better suited to sit-down trail riders. It’s still a high-performance sled, not a cushy cruiser, and surprisingly only slightly less of a mogul-masher than what a Dragon SP is. If you want an even smoother ride, turn your attention to one of the IQ Shift models (with Ryde FX MPV gas cell shocks) that tone down the shock package for better small bump compliance. Gas cell shocks are almost always smoother than high pressure ones, but on the flip side they don’t control the bigger high speed hits nearly as well.
Frequently, riders will ask how the 600/800 IQ differs from a Dragon SP. They’re all IQ models, with the Dragons being white and the IQs black. Like stated above, the shock package and resulting suspension calibration is going to be the single biggest performance difference. Dragons are made for more aggressive riding, able to take on stand-up terrain more so, able to take on higher speeds and bigger bumps. This makes them more of a cross country sled than a trail sled. This is through the Walker Evans Piggyback shocks on the front of the Dragon SP, and a Walker Evans compression-adjustable rear track shock complimented by another Walker Evans shock at center.
The 600/800 IQ tones this down a bit with coil-spring Ryde FX Pro shocks in front, still high pressure IFPs. For the rear track shock, the 600/800 IQ has a FOX PS5 position-sensitive shock for comfort and ride quality. Don’t let the Fox PS5 track shock fool you; this is not a slow-speed cushy ride. The 600/800 IQ is a fairly compliant trail sled that can be ridden quite aggressively. It really surprised us
For comparison, there are X-packages and the Adrenaline models from Ski-Doo; the Sno-Pro and standard F-Series from Arctic Cat; the RTX and GT versions from Yamaha; and the Dragon SP and IQ models from Polaris. The higher-end versions are calibrated more for the harder charging rider, but not really up to the stand-up calibration of a race sled, where the lesser models are aimed more at the sit-down trail rider crowd, but still quite capable when the trails get rutted and rough.


With us so far? Some years, we find certain models are set up firmer or softer than what we expect for the intended rider.  Ski-Doo and Arctic Cat have been known to offer their X-package or Sno Pro with more of an expert calibration, only to have the masses of buyers complain about how firm they are. This was more of an issue back 7-8 years ago than lately. When we get to Polaris, we have found their 2009 models are extremely capable sleds in the rough, but they carry their performance through a broad range of conditions. The Dragon SPs are every bit as capable as a Sno Pro or X-package, and when you really push them hard they perform even better. Arguably the most controllable with confidence.
When we get to the 600/800 IQs, you find them to also be very capable when you ride them fairly hard, to the point you might wonder why anyone would need a Dragon SP. They are on the higher end of what we would call a “trail sled”, as they are not as comfortable as a Ski-Doo Adrenaline or a Arctic Cat F-Series, but again, we find them to provide excellent control in the trashed out rough trails when you really push them hard. Part of this has to be the IQ front suspension, as it gives you control and confidence through the travel. We don’t believe they have quite as responsive of steering as the Ski-Doos or even the 2009 Cats, but they’re plenty adequate and can be given more responsiveness with simple carbide replacements and suspension adjustments.
The 600/800 IQ also comes with a slightly taller windshield (that doesn’t work much better) compared to the low chrome shield and handguards of the Dragon SP. The IQs get a 1” Hacksaw track for improved top speed, where the Dragon SPs get a 1.25” RipSaw that is better suited for loose snow more often found off trail. And the 600/800 IQ comes with a shorter 2.4” bar riser with standard handlebars that is better suited to sit-down riding (compared to the tall 5.25” riser and straight bars with hooks on the Dragon SPs that are better for stand-up riding).
One area where Polaris leads the pack is in all-out engine performance. Their 600 H.O. CFI and 800 H.O. CFI are industry leaders for their classes in terms of raw acceleration and peak horsepower. The 600 H.O. is rated at a stout 125 HP, and the 800 H.O. comes in at a whopping 154 HP, making it the one to beat in this class. They’ve pretty much proven themselves in terms of durability and reliability and are pretty easy on oil. About the only points we can take away here would be for fuel economy, as they use some fuel to make this kind of go-fast power. They’re not that much different than the Arctic Cat engines of these sizes, and nowhere close to the fuel economy of the Yamaha four-strokes or the Ski-Doo two-strokes.
That being said, once you mash the throttle on the 800 IQ you’ll soon forget about the tank size or the range, as the rocket ship blasts off the pad and your ride to the moon begins. We had one of the limited build 800 IQs late last spring, and it was one of the most outrageous stock sleds we’ve ever had. This was almost mod sled throttle response and acceleration. It was very surprising and the torque was as thick as you could get from a two-stroke, to the point it made you forget about 900s and 1000s. No need to go that big with an 800 that pulls like this one does. That’s because of the magical 100 foot-pounds of torque. Horsepower is a calculation, where torque is what you feel; it is a measurement. The Liberty 800 H.O. CFI never gives you anything less than 80 foot-pounds of torque from 6000 RPM on up. That is what you feel when you squeeze the throttle. It jumps to attention and you smile a very big smile.
For most anyone under 200 pounds, the 600 H.O. CFI is going to be plenty of thrust for your rocket ship, and is easier on fuel (and your wallet). Lighter riders have more difficulty getting the power of a bigger engine to the ground, and they bring a more favorable power to weight ratio to the seat by being so much lighter. This is why we like to use a body weight figure as a good indicator for engine size. We’re sure there are some of you out there who weigh under 200 pounds and are perfectly capable of hanging onto an 800 IQ, so don’t be offended. We’re just trying to help out those who might not know which way to go. Where the Arctic Cat 600s now seem slightly underpowered in the F-chassis, we don’t get that feeling with the Polaris 600s (or the Ski-Doo 600s).
Our suggestion for aggressive Polaris trail riders is to add a taller windshield, strap one of the custom-fit Polaris gear bags on top of the tunnel and get the suspension set to your liking. We were very pleased and impressed with the 800 IQ we have. Not as cushy as a Cat, not as good of fuel economy as a Ski-Doo, but “wow” what a motor, and it’ll go through the rough with more confidence and control. Polaris calls that “ride and handling”.  We say, where was this sled five years ago?
The 2009 Polaris 600 IQ retails for $8,999 and the 800 IQ sells for $9,999, making it an extreme value in the world of hyper sleds. Both models are black with white and red graphics.

 

2009 Yamaha FX Nytro XTX

The hottest new sled from Yamaha for 2009 is the crossover-class FX Nytro XTX. Based on the all-new-for 2008 FX Nytro, the XTX comes to the plate with an unusual combination of features that place it in a class of its own when it comes to a sled that will perform well across the widest range of conditions.

The secret to the FX Nytro XTX is in the combination of front and rear suspensions and the 144” track length on tipped up rails. Don’t get excited at the 144” length. SnowTech test riders found this package to act way shorter than the number 144” would indicate, at least on packed trails. With the tipped up rails at the rear of the track, the effective wheelbase on packed snow is the same as a 121” sled. The cornering effort and character is very much like a 121” FX Nytro (2009 version). Through the bumps, the sled is going to act more like a 136” tracked sled, bridging the bumps and smoothing out the ride quality better than a short wheelbase 121” track sled. But when you get into snow of any substance or depth, the entire track length is presented to the snow and you get the benefit of the footprint and flotation of a 144” track. This lets the FX Nytro XTX float through the powder like the 144” tracked sled that it is. Short tracked cornering, mid-length bump bridging, and long track flotation, all in one sled. Cool, huh?
If it seems like you’ve heard this argument before, you’re right. Polaris made their Switchback sleds famous with this basic formula, using tipped up rails and a 144” track length, only to go back to a 136” track length in the past couple of years. Yamaha looked at what Polaris did and didn’t do with their version, and took it to the next level by tipping the rails up further to a six-degree angle. They felt the Polaris version didn’t have enough rail angle and still had too much track on the ground to really act like a 121” sled on hard packed trails.


Yamaha didn’t just want another “me-too” crossover sled, they wanted something unique and different. Simply being an FX Nytro with a long track would have done that, but they really wanted to bridge the gap between their 121” corner-carvers and their deep-lug mountain sleds. Here at SnowTech we’ve been pretty vocal over the past couple of seasons on how we have found the 144” track length to be the better deep snow sled for those looking for a true crossover, and Yamaha agreed. They also found the added length really makes a difference when you get a couple feet of fresh powder, as they do a large amount of their Midwest deep snow testing in the same area we do (western upper Michigan lake effect snow belt, down wind of Lake Superior).
But when the snow got hard and the best riding went to the groomed trails, they didn’t like how the added length of the 144” handled, as it really took some muscle to get the beast around a corner. Thus, the exaggerated tipped up rails. This let them have a true rough trail and off trail sled in one, as good as could be.
The new dual-shock CK 144 rear suspension in the XTX is the heart of the difference, fitted with a remote reservoir clicker compression-adjustable 40mm rear shock and a 40mm HPG at center. You know this sled is serious about taking on the bumps and terrain. This is a two-way coupled suspension, so it isn’t a ski-dangler like the uncoupled rails used on the Polaris Switchbacks when they were at 144” (ala RMK). Being coupled, the suspension provides excellent pitch control and reduced kickback, meaning when you hit a bump with the front arm the suspension communicates the bump to the rear arm and it starts to get out of the way, minimizing the angle of the rails as the bump moves though the suspension. This really goes back to the FAST M-10 and the original Polaris XTRA-14 designs, and has been proven effective ever since. It also allows the shock and springs of each suspension arm to work together, instead of independently, for improved resistance to bottoming. Adjustable control rods let you set the moment of coupling and amount of transfer, so if you like less coupling and more transfer for deeper snow you can quickly set it that way.
Traction is provided via a 1.25” lug height Camoplast Ripsaw track, 15” wide. For the track to live on the hardpack at high speed, this choice was logical. A 1.5” lug height would be a good option if you ride out west or despise packed trails, but that would take away from the top speed capability and makes the hyfax temperature more of an issue at speed on minimal snow. With the 144” length, the lug height is less of an issue.


Don’t think this is simply an FX Nytro with a longer track, especially a 2008 FX Nytro. Many changes have been made, so the XTX acts and looks very different. Even compared to the 2009 FX Nytro RTX, the XTX has a tapered tunnel, better suited for deep snow operation. The running board angle is steeper as well, letting this one get down into the powder instead of being held up to cavitate in the snow. It looks WAY better in our opinion, as well.
One sore spot we had with our 2008 FX Nytro short trackers last season was the front suspension; more accurately the handling character. You had to be on your game at all times, which made it difficult to sit back and relax during a ride of much length. Yamaha heard this from a number of their riders, so they quickly went to work and made a new front suspension that is far more to our liking. Ten changes to the geometry and components include new (shorter) a-arms, tie-rods, spindles with new ski mount points and new ski rubbers. They also added 15mm of “trail” (less upright spindle) and reduced the caster angle by four degrees. Basically, the new front suspension has much less bump steer, which was what we were feeling as the sled wanted to wander through the bumps. The steering response is now slower and not as twitchy; far more stable and predictable is how we describe it. Steering is more consistent, cornering is flatter, it darts less, tracks straighter, and now you can ride it faster with more confidence (fewer white knuckle rides).
Bolted to this new front end we find dual-clicker front shocks with 12 clicks of compression and 20 clicks of rebound damping adjustment. Piggyback reservoirs give the shocks increased fade resistance, well matched to the rear suspension. We’re telling you, this thing can handle some fairly rough terrain.
No discussion of a FX Nytro would be complete without talking about the Genesis 130FI 4-stroke engine. The fast-revving, high torque three-cylinder is a screamer with unreal throttle response and acceleration. This smooth-running 1050cc uses Yamaha’s highly advanced fuel injection technology and spools up quickly thanks to a lightweight crankshaft to deliver razor-sharp throttle response. And unlike it’s four-cylinder cousins in the Apex models, the Genesis 130FI features a unique Engine Braking Reduction System (EBRS). This technology keeps the clutch slightly engaged to give the sled a “coast” feeling when the throttle is released, instead of the typical 4-stroke compression braking followed by the clutch disengaging. Dare we say, this is likely the best engine in snowmobiling.
The FX Nytro is still a Nytro, so it gives you the rider forward seating on a tall and narrow seat, so long-ride comfort is not a strong point. Suspension capability is, as is engine performance and durability. Despite the engine being centered, you can still tell it is a (542 pound) four-stroke as it places more weight on the skis than a two-stroke sled does. The 7.4 gallon fuel tank is really small, but stellar fuel economy pretty much makes up for it. Wind protection is minimal, but with this kind of world class engine and do-all capability, it should run like a top for way longer than any two-stroke could hope to. That’s what Yamaha is banking on. Of all the FX Nytro models, this is what we will be riding this year.
The 2009 Yamaha FX Nytro XTX comes in your choice of traditional Yamaha Blue with white graphics, or a unique White with silver graphics. It retails for $10,549.

 

2009 Arctic Cat Crossfire R

A Lightweight & Agile Go-Fast Firecat Replacement

Mention “Crossfire” to any Arctic Cat rider and they instantly know what you’re talking about. They know the Crossfire is the 136” track length crossover sled that looks like a Firecat under the hood, but has a chassis that is derived more from the M-Series mountain sleds than it is from the Firecat. That means the Crossfire has a bunch of lightweight parts, and most importantly, it has the rider-forward ergonomics and seating position. You can ride it with ease, making it far better suited for transition type riding where you go from sitting to standing. And even if you’re a sit-down rider, being centered on the sled has been shown to have all kinds of great benefits when it comes to handling, fatigue, and bump isolation. You simply feel better after a long ride.
So when Arctic Cat came out with their F-Series sleds a couple years ago to replace the Firecat, a good number of Firecat owners didn’t take to the F-sleds. Some didn’t like the looks. Some didn’t like how heavy it was. Some believed it was slower. Some just didn’t think it was the “right” sled for a Firecat owner to upgrade to. Despite the great ride quality, Twin Spar rigid chassis, and adjustable seat and handlebars, Arctic Cat didn’t see the Firecat owners flock to the F-Series sleds like they had anticipated


That bunch of snowmobilers at Thief River Falls always looks at things differently, and they did it again. They saw how many of the Firecat owners were buying their longer tracekd Crossfire models instead of their F-Series sleds. The Crossfire was more of a rider-forward Firecat, as it was light, agile, fast, and gave the Firecat owners most of what they wanted from a new sled. Except, having a longer track it wasn’t quite as agile, wasn’t quite as fast, and took a bit more effort to get it around corners. If it only had a shorter track…….
Sometimes the obvious solution is right under your nose. Why couldn’t they just make a short-tracked version of the Crossfire? Sure, it would take some development to make a shorter tunnel and get the suspensions calibrated, and then to dial in the gearing and clutching calibrations, but for the most part it would be an easy way to solve the problem. The problem? Arctic Cat riders who owned and loved their Firectas that wanted a rider-forward version of their sled that was light, super fast, agile, and cornered like it was on rails. Sure sounds like an Arctic Cat rider, doesn’t it?
So, we proudly introduce the 2009 Arctic Cat Crossfire R. This is going to confuse some people, but not savvy Arctic Cat riders. This sled is a Crossfire with a narrower (14” wide) and shorter (128”) track. Compare this to the Firecats with their 13.5” width and 128” length and you start to realize the capability. This is a full eight inches shorter than the 2006-2008 Crossfire models, and a whopping 13” shorter than the stretched 2009 Crossfire models that are now more deep snow capable with their 141” track length.
If you own a Firecat, the first thing you will notice when you ride a Crossfire R is the seating position. Your knees are no longer above your hips, which means you don’t have to bench press your entire body weight to get your butt up off the seat when you want to stand up, or just get your butt up off the seat for some big bumps. You’ll find yourself sitting in a more centered position. But, with the shorter track length and the narrow track, the Crossfire R gives you the blistering top speed and acceleration that so many Firecat owners love. And now you get an even better handling sled, despite the slightly taller seating position, along with more stability.
What do you lose? Compared to an F-Series sled, probably about fifty pounds. Maybe more, maybe less. You don’t have as stiff of a chassis as the F-Series models, so you don’t get that rock solid feel through the bumps. We don’t believe the Crossfire R (without the Slide Action rear) rides quite as well as say an F8, but it’s still pretty good. Better than a Firecat though. With the narrower track and a fast 1” lug height of the Hacksaw track, this sled is better suited for studding as well, but you admittedly lose some of the traction and loose snow capability.
The Crossfire R models do get some treats, in the form of adjustable handlebars like an F-Series. They’re lower than a normal Crossfire, to be expected. And, you can utilize the sweet accessory items that fit all of the new 2009 Crossfire models. High-pressure IFP shocks all around give you the resistance to bottoming you demand, none of the gas cell crap here. The windshield is low, more for top speed, but can be swapped for a taller one if you want some protection when the temps get down below zero. You’ll also find large cutout running boards, great for letting the snow fall down to the ground instead of building up ice, and the “about time” push-button electronic engine reverse that Arctic Cat has been working on getting for so many years. Better late than never.
The 2009 Arctic Cat Crossfire R comes in your choice of a throttle-body EFI 800cc two-stroke with about 145 HP, or the stunning 1000cc throttle-body EFI with 170+ HP for insane top speed and acceleration. While neither of these engines gets the fuel economy of a four-stroke or a transfer-port/direct-injection two-stroke, they are still respectable and provide turn-key performance with no choke to pull and no jetting to change; just start and go. These motors both have proven track records, so there are no durability/reliability issues to worry about. There’s nothing new that needs to get worked out for a season, and both sizes get a new ECU calibration for improved hot restarts. The 800 will use 20% less oil this year with improved cold drive away. The fuel map for the 1000 has been improved as well. Both engines work well, with thick power bands and great top end performance.
We keep talking about how fast these sleds are. When we went up to Thief River to do some testing with the prototypes, the Cat boys took us to a drainage ditch that was well protected and very flat and fast. They had a radar speed trap set-up so we could run the sleds through time after time, run after run, to which we obliged – with honor. We ran every single sled they had there for us to sample, from all of their own hardware to all of the competitive sleds as well. They wanted to not only show everyone how fast their new Crossfire R was, but also their new 4-stroke Z1 turbo and their F-Series sleds, which really are pretty fast. And, they wanted to show us how slow some of the competitive models were, despite their reputations.
We always approach tests like this with caution, as the competitive sleds are usually dogs and not true representatives of their brands, but we can rely on the data from the Arctic Cats that we were able to romp with. There was even a well set-up 2003 F7, which was the fastest year of the Firecats (in our opinion). Curiously, their F8 was actually faster than the Crossfire R 800 on top end, averaging 106.2 mph vs. 105.3, and 105.7 for the F7. But when it came to 1/4 mile acceleration runs, the Crossfire R 800 was the fastest with an average 1/4 mile ET of 12.72 vs. 12.87 for the F8 and 12.96 for the F7. Thus, the Crossfire R 800 will win a drag race.
In the 1000 class, the Crossfire R 1000 averaged a top speed of 110.7, compared to the F1000 at 107.5 with the F7 at 105.7 mph. The Z1 Turbo clocked an average of 112.6 mph at top end and would run them all down in a long run, but the Crossfire R 1000 is quicker; it averaged 12.44 seconds in the quarter while the Z1 Turbo averaged 12.52 seconds. For comparison, a Ski-Doo XP 800 averaged 13 seconds through the quarter with an average top speed of 101.7 mph.
The 2009 Arctic Cat Crossfire R 800 retails for $9,799 and the Crossfire R 1000 goes for $11,499. Both are available in your choice of Black with green and white graphics, or Orange with white and black graphics. There’s even a cool sabercat graphic on the side panel that lets your buddies know you’re going to eat them alive, just like an Arctic Cat should. Bring on the lakes.

 

Improvise and Adapt

It’s kind of funny, almost comical, to see and hear the reaction and predictions of non-snowmobilers towards our sport in these times of high fuel prices. Some of them actually think that we’re just going to give up and go away. This simply demonstrates how little they actually know and understand us in the first place.

Many will slowly change their habits, a process that humans are quite adept at; I call it “improvise and adapt”. So, gas prices are pretty high. Do you really think that somebody who loves to snowmobile (like all of us, evidenced by reading a publication like SnowTech) are really going to roll over and walk away from their passion? It will be one of the LAST things they give up, not the first. Instead, we will all improvise and adapt.

Instead of going for a 250 mile ride on a given day, we might start later, end earlier, ride slower, and ride fewer miles. Instead of making numerous weekend trips from Friday to Sunday over the course of a winter, we might make fewer trips for more days to reduce the travel expense. Instead of hauling your sleds back and forth, you might leave them there and just transport the riders. Instead of trailering to far away riding areas, we might tend to stay closer to home.          Instead of riding a ten-year old sled without powervalves, we will ride a newer four-stroke machine, or one of the newer two-strokes with almost twice the fuel economy of the older technology. From transfer-port injection to the all-new direct-injection technologies, snowmobile fuel economy has almost doubled in the past ten years – yet our industry is rarely recognized for such a monumental improvement.

And yes, there will likely be a trend away from the one-ton and 3/4 ton trucks that some of us drive, back down to 1/2 ton and unibody-style trucks that are lighter and get better fuel economy. And some of us will get rid of their trucks altogether and be more like the Europeans, using a car to pull a trailer. Most cars have at least a 1,000 pound tow capacity with no trailer brakes. Add brakes to the trailer and a tranny cooler and the towing capacity rises.

The fact of the matter is that just because fuel prices are higher than they have been in the past doesn’t mean the passionate snowmobiler is going to fade away. Quite the contrary. We will work harder and smarter, and we will improvise and adapt. Maybe we will see consumer demand go back to wanting smaller, lighter sleds with more fuel efficient engines, as this trend is already in place. Sales of the 600cc class sleds remains strong, but it wasn’t too many years ago that a 600 was considered “big”. By today’s standards, a 600 is considered “small”. Ski-Doo enjoys great demand with their 500SS models, which are actually a fuel-efficient 600cc liquid-cooled CARBURETED two-stroke that gets fuel economy remarkably close to the all-new direct-injection ETEC models. The difference isn’t as huge as you might think, except in the $$$ each costs.

Polaris knows their Indy 500 was one of the best selling snowmobiles of all time, and they would love to re-introduce that kind of model to the industry once again. Light, agile, responsive, and inexpensive, an Indy 500 could get you up to 70-75 mph with plenty of acceleration and not drain the fuel tank as quickly as a sled with twice the horsepower. Maybe the time is right for their “new” Indy 500 to be introduced.

Yamaha is poised well, with their efficient Phazer models. The 500cc four-strokes really do sip the fuel, and while they’re not 100 mph rockets, you can throw them around and have a complete and total riot riding them, especially in pairs. We love them for paint-swapping tight quarters riding, almost like going to a high-powered go-kart track.

Even Arctic Cat has kept a fuel-efficient 500cc in their line, with the single-throttle body F5 that still gives you a respectable 80 HP but does so with economy in mind, instead of blistering acceleration.

And with even more EPA rules coming for 2010, the sled offerings and the average fuel economy are only going to get better. Remember, the EPA snowmobile rules were brought about VOLUNTARILY by the snowmobile manufacturers.

Point is, all of the snowmobile manufactures are capable of building sleds that we are willing to buy. As our habits change, so will what they offer. Snowmobiling is healthy and here to stay, make no doubt about it. It will simply be a matter of improvise and adapt.

By Kevin Beilke

 

USCC WAIVES MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR MEN AND WOMEN IN ARMED-SERVICES

Minto, ND (Nov. 27, 2008) – Last season, U.S.C.C. received several membership inquiries from racers who are also active members of our Armed Forces. Because of there obligation to the military, they were trying to decide whether or not it would be wise to purchase a U.S.C.C. season membership. As a way to help them out, U.S.C.C. made special arrangements with these racers on a case-by-case basis.

“This season all active military personnel will receive their U.S.C.C. season membership free of charge,” said Pat Mach, U.S.C.C. President. “There was uncertainty with them as to whether or not they would be able to compete at the events  they had planned on attending due to the concern of their military obligations. This way they can lock in their race number and all the benefits that come with a season membership without having to wonder if they will be able to fully utilize their investment.”

“In my opinion, I consider rewarding our racing military members with a free membership is the least we can do as an organization,” Mach said. “These men and women, along with their families, are making extraordinary sacrifices so that we may  continue to enjoy all the benefits of the freedom they work so hard to protect. So, to all our military members, I say “Thank You”. Good luck this season and I hope to see you often!”

USCC’s first race, “The Gonvick 100” is scheduled for December 20, 2008 at Gonvick, MN.

 

MX Z 500SS Electric Start

Dale Daudt of Jenkins, Minnesota says; “I am writing in response to John in Connecticut with the clutch engagement problem on his 2007 Ski-Doo MX Z 500SS with electric start (Dear Ralph ‘It Ain’t Right’ March 2008).
I have experienced the very same problem from 0-10 mph. I installed a TEAM primary spring, part number #210141-014. This spring has a rate of 160-380, so you could also use Ski-Doo part number 417 222 703 which should also be a 160-380 rate spring. Your problem will go away!”

 

No Oil Shortage

Don’t believe what you read and hear about the so-called shortage of oil. The good old USA has plenty of oil, and a huge amount of it is in North Dakota. Didn’t hear about that yet? You should be asking why not.
America is sitting on top of a super massive 200 billion barrel oil field that could potentially make America energy independent and, until now, has largely gone unnoticed. Thanks to new drilling technology, the “Bakken Formation” in North Dakota could boost America’s oil reserves by an incredible 10 times, giving western economies the trump card against OPEC’s short squeeze on oil supply and making Iranian and Venezuelan threats of disrupted supply irrelevant.
The USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) released a report in April giving an accurate resource assessment of the Bakken Oil Formation that covers North Dakota and portions of South Dakota and Montana. With new horizontal drilling technology it is believed that from 175 to 500 billion barrels of recoverable oil are held in this 200,000 square mile reserve that was initially discovered in 1951. The USGS did an initial study back in 1999 that estimated 400 billion recoverable barrels were present but with prices bottoming out at $10 a barrel back then the report was dismissed because of the higher cost of horizontal drilling techniques that would be needed, estimated at $20-$40 a barrel.
It was not until 2007, when EOG Resources of Texas started a frenzy when they drilled a single well in Parshal N.D. that is expected to yield 700,000 barrels of oil that real excitement and money started to flow in North Dakota. Marathon Oil is investing $1.5 billion and drilling 300 new wells in what is expected to be one of the greatest booms in oil discovery since oil was found in Saudi Arabia in 1938.
The United States imported about 14 million barrels of oil per day in 2007, which means U.S. consumers sent about $340 Billion Dollars over seas building palaces in Dubai and propping up unfriendly regimes around the World. If 200 billion barrels of oil at $90 a barrel are recovered in the high plains, the added wealth to the U.S. economy would be $18 Trillion Dollars! This would go a long way in stabilizing the U.S. trade deficit and could cut the cost of oil in half in the long run. Oil shortage? Not here!
Resource: Next Energy News